פרסומים אחרונים במדור "טור אישי"

http://www.cps.ca/english/statements/FN/fn96-01.htm

"Given an 85-year life expectancy, these investigators calculated that the expected lifetime cost of routine neonatal circumcision was $164.61 per patient, and the quality-adjusted survival was 84.999 years. For those not circumcised, the expected mean lifetime cost was $139.26 per patient and the quality-adjusted survival was 84.71 years. The investigators therefore concluded there was no medical indication for circumcision or contraindication against it. According to their sensitivity analyses, if the rate of surgical complications of neonatal circumcision fell below the threshold value of 0.6%, then circumcision would be preferred, both in terms of its cost and its favourable effect on lifespan. Similarly, if the risk of penile problems among uncircumcised males rose to 17% from the baseline value of 14%, then circumcision would be preferred from a cost perspective."

http://www.daat.ac.il/daat/refua/brite-4.htm

I'm surprised at the linkage between the Mayan and Incan cultures, which I believe existed in separate geographical areas, but will do further checking.

Also, while Mayan culture was, indeed, very advanced in astrology, mathematics and other fields (so were the Incans) I don't believe they were monotheistic (nor do I see an evident connection between monotheism and progress).

But, yes, the Mayan buildings and the Egyptian pyramids do resemble each other. There may have been a migration of people which led to a migration of ideas, but the geographical distance makes it somewhat difficult to establish.

I'll ask around and come back.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0530...

---------------

Yes, I know of the Inca human sacrifices, I was just wondering about the Mexico mention. Thanks for the links!

This can also be seen in the laws of the Sumerian king of Lagash, Urukgina.
Dating to around 2415 BC these are
the earliest set of laws found to date. They contain a code imposing
monogamy only on women. If the woman breaks this
law she is "stoned with stones (upon which is inscribed her evil) intent"8.
Also, Urukgina apparently legalised wife-beating:
"The woman who has sinned by saying something to the man which she should
not have said ... must have her teeth crushed
with burnt bricks upon which ... her guilty deed has been inscribed."9 This
code seems to be conclusive evidence of the
position of women, Kramer describes it as "one of the most precious
revealing documents in the history of man."10
However, there is no evidence, as there is with the Laws of Hammurabi for
example, that Urukgina's code was
employed over the whole of Sumer. In 2415 BC, the cities of Sumer were still
very territorial and constant wars took
place; Gilgamesh's attack on Kish, is just one example, there are many
others. Bearing this in mind it is unlikely that one
king's code would be used throughout the whole of Sumer. It does show us,
though, the opinion of one king, on the place
of women in society and it is not wrong to assume that this view may have
been shared by others.

"... when the ancestors of the right honorable gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in Solomon's temple.".

Yeah,
but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal?

Personality goes a long way.

"We'd have to talk about one motherf***ing charming pig!"