Serendipity seems to be just another name for the theological concept of Grace
In catholicism
Divine grace is associated with mother Mary
Yet it is deeply rooted from asncient times and accross cultures with events induced by the white Goddess
the mother of all inspiration
See for example white goddess themes such as
When I am in a time of trouble mother Mary comes to me
Tell me words of wisdom, let it be
Or in Hebrew poetry and literature,
loyal lovers of the white Goddess
are Nathan Alterman and Alexander Pen
where Nathan Zach or Avidan are her opponents

Or rather David Avidan betrayed the White Goddess in his later years, which inevitably led to the sisyphian
nature, the effortful non
flowing and uninspired charachter
of his late "art"; and to development of time-chased
sensationism and paranoid features at the night of his life

The laws of nature that Man "invented" work, because otherwise they wouldn't be called laws. They are simply formalizations of the patterns people have perceived in nature.

I did not take a Physics lab 1. Therefore, I am not an example of someone who took Physics lab 1, and what you just wrote has nothing to do with reality. So there.

Now, silly boy's games may be fine and dandy, but I don't think that they are appropriate for any kind of self-respecting forum. If I can understand how terse and offensive messages, no matter how justified, can cause a discussion to deteriorate, I don't see why you can't. I'm certainly no remarkable genius, however some people may interpret my grade-sheet, with low self-esteem affecting their judgement.

Okay, I'm going to make this very clear.
My original message to Mr. Meshulam was referring to the tendency of people with scientific knowledge in a specific field to assume that they are experts in every field of science, philosophy, and animal husbandry. The patronizing tone was originally Mr. Meshulam's.

I never claimed to be any big hot-shot in anything. I am merely an Undergraduate in Computer Science, just like millions of people all around the world. I haven't even published any papers yet, and there is only one reference to my work in one specific conference paper draft, and there my work is shown as an example of the how cumbersome it is to reference code in Java. Imagine my embarassment.

Great. Good for you that you have a Master's in Physics, and are close to concluding your Doctorate. Physics is quite an interesting subject, which I hope some day to acquaint myself more with. I'm sure it's been hard work. That, specifically, doesn't make you an authority on the philosophy of science, or on biology, or whichever. It does make you an authority in Physics and in basic scientific methods.

I, for one, am not an authority on anything special at all, as far as I know.

Agreed?

Also The Nobel prize laurate(Physics) Enriko Fermi
together with Jung
It is a non causal principle refering to the availing together in a time/space point of multiple elements having a major common property
or belonging to a common category
No mechanism is suggested since this principle is held to be non causal
It just "names" a property of empirical observation
As yet, it is a phenomenon that cannot be accounted for by our scientific concepts
You "took it from my mouth
the same association was apparently evoked in both of
us at about the same time
Maybe we shoud discuss it together?

(Objection! Speculative.
Overruled. The witness will answer the question.)