Let me understand: So, the relevant and proportional reaction for the Justice made with the bloody terrorist is a bloodshed exerted on 39 civilians?

I urged for further clarification ("Let me understand)
You mentioned:
A Barbarian act of revenge
This may well imply "out of proportion", doesn't it?
You wrote:
Bearing no relevance for operations and circumstances preempting it
this may well imply that the other's side reaction is relevant and reasonable, doesn't it?
You exclaimed: A war crime. Does it mean that the murderous terrorist was not brought to Justice under the circumstances where he was released from prison, going around free
Did I understand well that by this you accuse senior Zahal officers of war-crimes?
Who are they.
In fact Sir, I couldn't believe my eyes, and what was further reasonable to deduce from your claims, so I demanded further clarification. Maybe you did not in fact mean what was fairly apparent from your comment.
I wanted to understand--