After a lovely weekend, in which I took part in two public disscussion at two differernt cities about Israel, and gave my two (Euro) Cents on the matter, I will resume my responses here.

I do not support violence of any kind as a means to solve conflicts.
Not state sponsered violence, and not personal violence.

Beyond that initial feeling, which guides me in my personal life, I´m aware of the nature of the world in which we are living in, which sometimes conflicts with my own perosal feeling.

I hope this answers the question.

So, I stand accused, once more, of being sympathetic to the terrorist acts commited by some organizations.
Just to be clear: I do not support it. I think that a peaceful solution of the Zionist-Palestinian conflict can be achieved, despite the terror acts commited by both sides.

I will state again that in the eyes of the International Law, acts of violence against military and civilian forces ,which are done in self-defense by those suffering from acts of war-crimes, are justifiable (including Homicide).
As I wrote in a previous message to this article, I am ambigious to the "Self-Defense" clause, since it has been brutally abused by almost all who use violence.

As for support to the PA:
I have no sympathy for dictators and oppressors.
I think that thw PA is suffering from severe corruption and lack of support from the Palestinian people, but those people seem to have no choice - not now, and not since the Oslo Accords were initiated - except joining a religious group.
In my opinion, the Oslo Accords were meant to create a Palestinian dictatorship, fully dependant in Israel economically, yet responsible to maintain the anger and rage of the Palestinian people themselves, so that it will not explode onto Israel, but be contained in a semi-autonomy.
I will not go into this now, since it is difficult for me as it is to answer like this, but I will reference all those who please to learn more to search for the writing of such people as Edward Said and Noam Chomsky on the matter.