Actually, Eitam could claim that it was, much like Mathematical claims, a "claim bereft of existence." That is, "if Arabs are not give the right to vote, then there is no demographic problem," just like "if f is differentiable, then it is continuous." Taking sentences out of context (for intance, claiming tha tI was saying that functions should be differentiable, which of course oppresses the vast majority of functions, which are not) is a very easy way to drag people into pointless debates.

Just nitpicking.

The real problem is, that since the Mafdal's charter was not changed, as far as I can tell, it may be immaterial what its head said, prior to him entering office. Any legal minds to assist?