למה זה לא הגיוני?!
זה מה שהם אומרים:
Active Cases = (total cases) - (total deaths) - (recovered). This figure represents the current number of people detected and confirmed to be infected with the virus. This figure can increase or decrease, and represents an important metric for Public Health and Emergency response authorities when assessing hospitalization needs versus capacity.
Recoveries = this statistic is highly imperfect, because reporting can be missing, incomplete, incorrect, based on different definitions, or dated (or a combination of all of these) for many governments, both at the local and national level, sometimes with differences between states within the same country or counties within the same state. WHO recommends following the criteria of [symptoms resolve + 2 negative tests within 24 hours] or [symptoms resolve + additional 14 days], but this is only a recommendation. In some countries, when a patient is discharged from the hospital it is counted as "recovered" even if no test is performed. Some health officials now consider anyone who was diagnosed with COVID-19 three or more weeks ago and has not died to be recovered from the disease. In view of this, "Active Cases" and "Closed Cases Outcome" which both depend on the number of recoveries (in addition to an accurate death count and a satisfactory rate of case detection, both of which are lacking in the vast majority of countries) can be affected by this inherent flaw for many countries and for the total worldwide count.
בריטניה, כאמור (שוב, שים לב למקור של הנתונים) לא מפרסמת recovered ולכן כל מה שיש להם זה לקחת את מספר החולים שלא מתו מלפני שבועיים. בהתחשב בעובדה שהם בעצמם אומרים שמדובר במדד "מאד לא מושלם", לא ברור לי למה אתה נטפל אלו, במקרה של מדינות בהן אין דיווח על מחלימים, אין לגרף הזה שום משמעות.
(נראה לי שהיית צריך להכיר את ההגדרה הזאת)
|