|
||||
|
||||
Wholistic* functioning: Is *
Kantian" *Synthesis* of experience " implied here by ?"Wholistic Do you mean that both undeniable existence of my experience (Descartes) and the synthesis of this experience )Kant) are 1) the source of objectivity of experience or 2) validate the existence of consciousness? |
|
||||
|
||||
note that unified experience is not necessary for consciousness to evolve
We know from concentrarion camps literature that under high stress , helplessness and information overload, experience can be fragmentized- into very short intervals seperating one chain of events from another like short "shots" in filming Eichmann to Kant: I refute thee thus Kant: But I define this as a pathology of consciousness The philosopher: But there is a conscious experience in this state Let's ask Eichman few more questions about his experience before being hanged when everything is sensed unreal So that at least we can say that consiousness is malleable and assuming various states, of which unification or even homogeneity is not one |
|
||||
|
||||
"Is not one"
should be "are not shared properties (or common denominator) " |
חזרה לעמוד הראשי | המאמר המלא |
מערכת האייל הקורא אינה אחראית לתוכן תגובות שנכתבו בידי קוראים | |
RSS מאמרים | כתבו למערכת | אודות האתר | טרם התעדכנת | ארכיון | חיפוש | עזרה | תנאי שימוש | © כל הזכויות שמורות |