Ye, you are so predictable. Instead of defending a theory that you brought up, in an article that you copied, you go again and hide behind “big historical names” and accuse me of being a holocaust denier. If you are so impress by big names why don’t you accept the analysis of ALL human rights origination that the state of Israel torture, kill, arrest, and hold in modern gulags suspends of Palestinian? Why are you defending Sharon a man that by most historical seculars is responsible for the Sabra and Shatila massacre? Is it because you are much more cormfatull to talk about oppression from seventy years ago?

Let’s play your game, I’m wrong, Stalin did kill millions. Everything was perfect before Stalin came along, new can we talk about torture and gulags in your country? Exactly. For you atrocities that are happening in your country are justified. You are using the same method of thinking that you criticizes. As long as murder torture and imprisonment is committed to defend the “mother land” you are o.k. with that. As long as your country kill, torture and imprison Palestinian in the name of the “people” you are fine.

If I discover and learn that Stalin (and Mao) did commit all those things that you say, I would stop upholding them as important political figures. Because unlike you I’m against ALL oppression, not just when if it happen 70 years ago. While repeating your mantra about how I’m a holocaust denier, you defend holocausts and atrocities that are happening as we speak.

Instead of just turning around and accusing me of being a holocaust denier why don’t you actually try to defend your article? Why don’t you try and defend your degrading notation of “human nature”? Teachers like you are responsible for the racist and ignorant education in Israel. While screaming at the top of your voice about holocaust and oppression that happened 70 years ago, you defend and protect mass killing that are happening as we speak.

Saying that your article was copy was wrong, and you deserve an apology for that. If it helps this is not what I meant.

You came up with an article that held the idea that the masses need a father figure to follow and as example you brought up Stalin. I disagreed and provided you with books and the latest article about the subject, which you ignored. Now, taking your theory about the masses need for a father like figure would mean that while most Israeli people knew about the killing and torture against Palestinian they still vote for and supported a murderer figure like Sharon just because they needed a father. Again I disagreed, and wrote that like in Germany people did not just follow leaders, a leader is a representative of a section of the population. And the fact that people in Israel vote for and support a murderer leader like Sharon reflects their views about the Palestinian.
I would argue that looking at the history of your country and the Zionist movement, your country does conduct a mass genocide against the Palestinian people. It’s not on the same scale as Germany did, but it is still genocide. With that you would disagree because when it comes to Palestinian all evident by human rights organizations is irrelevant.

But let’s pick some examples that would be easy for you, during the Vietnam War the U.S. bomb hundred and hundred of villages killing 4 million people. All this was only fought to protect the interest of empire and to support a corrupt government. Or during the 1970 when the C.I.A has assisted Pinochet in constructing a coup in Chile which resolve in thousands of people dieing at the hand of the Pinochet troops. Or during the 80s when Reagan and later Israel provided weapons to the contras who massacre whole villages. Why are all these examples are not jenocide? Is it because the systematic killing of Vietnamese was not conducted by sending them to concentration camps but by bombing them from the sky? Is it because the killing of the Chilean people was conducted by guns and not by gas? You are paying to much attention to official policy and less to practice and reality.
Now, if you go into a class and teach that the genocide against the Vietnamese people which resulted in 4 million people dieing was not the same as the Nazis killing 6 million Jews because there was no Treblinka or Oshwitch in Vietnam, what you are teaching and saying basically is that the blood of Vietnamese people is not equals to the blood of Jews. And that some how, the holocaust was more tragic and barbaric than the genocide and torture of the Vietnamese people.

I think that we should stop here, I made my point.