|
||||
|
||||
L.G.
we're going anyway. I wonder if this is what we want - but this is probably the way by it. controlled circumstances, and they will stop being so aroused like a vaccination - expose men to a lot of female nudity under the view. It just isn't such a big deal for them anymore. It is naked in the park, etc.) they may become less excited by naked women very often (e.g., in the sauna, or sunbathing is achieved it is very simple: When men get used to seeing From a practical point of view, I think the way this behavior It's simple. It's also safe. Men will simply not get so excited by your clothing. difference in the amount of sexual attention you will get. a square and show-nothing suit, there will be almost no with your sexiest skirt and a show-it-all shirt, or else with It means, for a woman, that whether you come to work generally colder, inhibited atmosphere. What does it mean? safer interaction with men, to have worse lovers and a This means that women should be prepared, in return for hormones and unable to control themselves properly. some of them (say, the hottest 10%) will be boiling with harassment, because if men are allowed to be "hot", There is no way to have "hot" men and no sexual to control their sexual instincts. They are "colder". about that). The reason is, perhaps, that men there learn countries (e.g., Scandinavia - correct me if I'm wrong Sexual harassment is less of a problem in less-macho I want to remark from a different point of view. |
|
||||
|
||||
I want to remark from a different point of view.
Sexual harassment is less of a problem in less-macho countries (e.g., Scandinavia - correct me if I'm wrong about that). The reason is, perhaps, that men there learn to control their sexual instincts. They are "colder". There is no way to have "hot" men and no sexual harassment, because if men are allowed to be "hot", some of them (say, the hottest 10%) will be boiling with hormones and unable to control themselves properly. This means that women should be prepared, in return for safer interaction with men, to have "colder" sex and a generally colder, inhibited atmosphere. What does it mean? It means, for a woman, that whether you come to work with your sexiest skirt and a show-it-all shirt, or else with a square and show-nothing suit, there will be almost no difference in the amount of sexual attention you will get. Men will simply not get so excited by your clothing. It's simple. It's also safe. From a practical point of view, I think the way this behavior is achieved it is very simple: When men get used to seeing naked women very often (e.g., in the sauna, or sunbathing naked in the park, etc.) they may become less excited by the view. It just isn't such a big deal for them anymore. It is like a vaccination - expose men to a lot of female nudity under controlled circumstances, and they will stop being so aroused by it. I wonder if this is what we want - but this is probably the way we're going anyway. L.G. |
חזרה לעמוד הראשי | המאמר המלא |
מערכת האייל הקורא אינה אחראית לתוכן תגובות שנכתבו בידי קוראים | |
RSS מאמרים | כתבו למערכת | אודות האתר | טרם התעדכנת | ארכיון | חיפוש | עזרה | תנאי שימוש | © כל הזכויות שמורות |