We know of no such attempts. Some reviews of our work are uploaded in our website (http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/view/typeeprint/review.ht...). To get the flavor of the “critiques,” read Kimmerling's along with our reply (http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/archive/00000116/).

The Epilogue is 67 pages long, including figures and tables. Are you saying that the “Left Bank” people are ready to upload the ENTIRE piece, “as is” and without any “editorial intervention”? We would be pleasantly surprised to hear that this is indeed their intention....

The issue is not “technical,” Dor. We have the original Word file, of course, which can be easily converted to HTML. The point here – at least according to the above correspondence – is that the “Left Bank” people want to “cut” the paper their way. We have had enough of that censorship. If they want to post the piece as is, by all means. Otherwise – well, no thank you.

We have no objection to HTML versions, of course. It is just a lot of work. If there are people who wish to convert our work into HTML, we will be happy to have them contact us.

How do you get books into Google’s book project and into Wikipedia?