* 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲 (𝗞𝗲𝗻 𝗟𝗶𝘂)  /  Speculative fiction (short stories)  /  A bit gimmicky, but worth reading. Some stories are quite good.
* 𝗙𝗶𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 (𝗝𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗟𝘂𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀)  /  Speculative fiction (short stories)  /  Nothing I can add.
* 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿'𝘀 𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝟯 [𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗻 𝗞𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 (𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿)]  /  Science fiction (short stories)  /  Mostly bad.
* 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗜 (𝗚.𝗥.𝗥. 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻, 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿)  /  Superheroes  /  Surprisingly(?) good. A fun read.
* 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗮 (𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗴 𝗘𝗴𝗮𝗻)  /  Science fiction  /  Egan is a prophet. His scriptures are ethereal.
* 𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰 (𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗴 𝗘𝗴𝗮𝗻)  /  Science fiction (short stories)  /  Egan is a prophet. His scriptures are ethereal.
* 𝗚𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 (𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀)  /  Science fiction  /  Meh minus, if that.
* 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮 (𝗜𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀)  /  Speculative fiction  /  Thrilling and very original. Highly recommended.
* 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗱𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 (𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗮 𝗙𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲) [Hebrew Translation]  /  Prose  /  Entertaining. And similarly to the Neapolitan novels - it’s somehow decent literature instead of the lowbrow soap opera it should have morally been (but also, pretty much more of the same).
* 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝗞𝗲𝗻 𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁) [Hebrew Translation]  /  Historical fiction  /  Literary junk, badly written and borderline pornographic. Yet, here I am, at the fourth book of the sequence.

* 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 (𝗝𝗶𝗺 𝗕𝗮𝗴𝗴𝗼𝘁𝘁)  /  Popular science (Physics)  /  Trite and stuffy. Bah.
* 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲 (𝗠𝗮𝘅 𝗧𝗲𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸)  /  Popular science (Physics)  /  Intriguing. I had better and more challenging debates with this book while reading it, than most of the debates I had with actual people.
* 𝗢𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝘆𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗟𝗶𝗲 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗿𝘆 (𝗥𝗶𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗻, 𝗝𝗼𝘀𝘁)  /  Mathematics and History of Mathematics (I’ve decided not to classify it as a “textbook”)  /  The original text is a very short transcription, whose groundbreaking originality and depth of far-reaching ideas are impossible to overstate. This is an annotated and expanded edition (by Jost).
* 𝗕𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 (𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗦𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗹𝘀𝗸𝘆)  /  Popular science (Biopsychology and Neuroscience)  /  The book has many flaws and problems, but it’s nevertheless an impressive masterpiece.
* 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗪𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 (𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗻𝗲)  /  Popular science (Neuroscience)  /  A popular introduction to the neuroscience of learning and brain plasticity (not a "self-help" book). Informative and fairly interesting.
* 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 (𝗜𝗺𝗿𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝗸𝗮𝘁𝗼𝘀)  /  Philosophy and History of Mathematics  /  Not much as a philosophy text, but remarkable as a history and pedagogy book. I wish I had read it as an undergraduate.
* 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱 (𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝗙𝗲𝘆𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗻𝗱)  /  Philosophy and History of Science  /  Yeah, well... boring. Somehow.
* 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 (𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗭 𝗔𝗹𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁)  /  Scientific philosophy  /  Definitely interesting, but could use an editor or two.