How do you know so much about the Shaba”k?

Maybe some more inside info will do? Is anybody was aware of the failed character in the Jewish department?

Dichter was talking where he was supposed to talk: in a government meeting, he did not talk to the media or the public; he was just doing his job, namely: reporting to his superiors. As usual his report was leaking out.

With all do respect I do not think that the data in your hand may allows you to come to a rational, intelligent conclusion regarding the Shaba’k’s Jewish Department performance, I do not have it either.
Judging their performance based on one or several events that the data about are coming from our (Talented????) journalists is out of reason.
Do you aware of their successes in the field they are in charge of? Are you sure you have been balanced in your criticism? You have been generalizing and that is not the right way to take, you know…. (See “Good Arab is a dead Arab” – talking about generalization, mind you).

The reports activity of Mr. Dichter is done within the Government meeting; he has no control on the circulation and exposure getting out of this meeting.
Sure enough he is aware of the openness of the meeting but that is our democratic system way, would you like to replace it perhaps?

BTW none of my relatives and friends ever worked for this establishment.

(http://www.tzionut.org/articles_details.asp?id=30)