בתשובה לא. ווטסון, 07/05/05 20:47
אף גמל לא רואה את הדבשת של עצמו 298899
Ha, I think you don’t have a problem with the thread (you are still here) but you don’t accept my hypothesis about the psyci-ido correlation. That’s cool. It is only a hypothesis. All I wanted to show is that this is not an unrealistic-crazy idea.

Here is another quote from a research I found on the subject:

The parallels between the two fields of research - values and trait inferences - go beyond the superficial similarity of key words used and involve some intriguing correspondences in empirical findings in both areas, despite the lack of inter- reference and some important differences in theoretical languages and methods of research. This is, for example, visible in the case of a distinction between competence-related and moral traits on the one hand, and a distinction between individualistic and collectivistic values on the other.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/...

Regarding few of your points:
בד"כ הקריטריון לנזקקות הוא די ברור...
Right, but this is the official criteria. We argue here about the “desired” criteria.

תש"ח ישאף לשיוויון *הזדמנויות* לכולם ... והתש"ר רוצה שיוויון ב*תוצאה*,
Right again. But I try to understand *WHY*


חזרה לעמוד הראשי

מערכת האייל הקורא אינה אחראית לתוכן תגובות שנכתבו בידי קוראים