You gave me a lot of facts. Then came up with a conclusion. None of them have relevance to what I claimed, namely, that Netanyahu is a good public-relations character. Actually, only the first two lines of your response had any relevance to said subject. Now, if you were to actually read what I had written, you'd see that I specifically implied that Netanyahu was a lousy Prime Minister.

But of course, for some people, the mere idea that Netanyahu would have any good traits is an abomination. "Boo hoo," they say, "he beat our Holy Shim'on Peres, he must be pure, unadulterated evil!" Or something of that sort. Otherwise, I can't explain it. Boggles the mind, really.