Buddy,
You are not a woman.
You are not a woman looking for work.
You are not a reasonable man with a logical set of arguments.
But we may admit, you can avoid being all that, and still not be working for Ramon.

I will say this is one of those cases that normally wouldn’t land in the courtroom. But as for “witch hunt” “bad naughty silly woman’s rights organisation” and “women won’t be hired anymore”, that’s illogical and not called for.

There were certain nasty macho norms in Israel, and women had to put up with an unfair share of harassment. It is good that people are working to change those norms, also through the court room.

If you are against changing those norms, you are either a pathological conservative, or someone who enjoys harassing.

When you believe that:
a. At a beginning of a sexual act the consent of both parties should not necessarily be secured.
b. The real nuisance in this case was the reaction of the woman movements.
c. A reasonable man should fear this verdict, and should consider therefore not employing women.
d. Ramon’s behaviour isn’t part of those norms that are changing in our times.
e. Regarding consent as an imperative part of any sexual act would bring us back to the Victorian era.
f. Physical contact is a sexual signal.
You are pathologically conservative.