I don't understand the logic, and I doubt if other readers will. Yes, women play basketball in a different league; what that does have to do with the court ruling? The court ruling was about equal boradcasting time, not about making them the same sport.

It's like saying that women wear different clothes, and therefore shouldn't be given equal work opportunities.

Absolutely *loved* the part where you describe womanhood as a disability.

(because the "normal" person, whole and unharmed, is healthy AND male, right?(

I think we're about done here. Thanks and good night.

‏¹ http://www.angelfire.com/pa/bluelifesavers/pee.html

My comment referred to the way he chose to put things, which showed how he defined normalcy and deviance, not to the actual comment about policy.

I'll ignore the last out-of-context remark (and your opinion of what is or isn't ridiculous); whoever the person who made the unfortunate comparison is, he's welcome to come up with an explanation for it by himself (or perhaps the comedians you quote have a point?) :).

Oh, and please don't make any assumptions about which sport I or others consider more exciting or interesting. I have to say that my interest in male basketball dropped considerably when I realized the match was mostly a financial one between countries battling over who has more money to purchase more foreigners for their teams. So yeah, big deal: Maccabi Tel Aviv can afford some more tall Americans. Yee-Hah.