First is first,

Ayelet, you are correct I misspelled Orli’s name but how do you know that, is their any official spelling to her last name (Phederbush, fedarbush perhaps) that you know better? What about your name, is that the official spelling of your name in English? Is anybody can tell (except you)?

Now to the actual issue

I never met Orli, I never heard about her previously, apparently I do not know much about the ‘First Broadcast Authority” except of what I read here or there in the newspapers, so you can trust that I am not holding any misconception or preoccupied with previous bad opinion about her or the other side (I am just not that belong to the “Branja” to be that opinionate about them all).

What is that alerted me to the case is the uniformed response of the news-people regarding her case leaning totally to her favor only. When I read tens and hundred news people defending her and smashing the other side without listening to the other side, my ‘Antennas’ are sensing trouble.

Reading deeper into the case (and I always cross referencing most of the news I read) shows some disturbing facts.

1. Orli did not respond to the Evil(?) of the other “Side” while she was there. Sure, she was protecting here job by that but it is hinting about the character.
2. Orly was creating an alibi to herself secretly and unlawfully by tapping conversation between her and her employers. Though some of the readers may justify the law breaking only to protect self (not me though), yet how come this act is making her better then the other side (if we are assuming a wrong doing by the other side, a “Fact” that was not proven yet)
3. Orli was not making a real effort to discuss her situation with her employers (Claiming that they are not listening is a faint excuse). Instead she was very fast to distribute the conversation recorded tapes with the media. I suspect that she was doing that knowing the support and the news stirs it will create, using the media cynically to work hard for her cause.
4. The whole taping of conversation case is having the smell of preparing a nice and worm job some other place outside of the ‘First Broadcasting Authority’

Now, I may be wrong, may be I am just hallucinating; maybe Orli is pure like an angel, after all I am basing some opinions not on first hand knowledge but on reading newspapers (and we all know how careful we should be doing that), but somehow the whole case does not adds up, I do believe now that there is a definite second face to the case’s coin.

As an Israeli and as far as I know you are not permitted recording the other without his consent and the court will not recognized this recording as an admissible evidence in the trial.
In Israel you have to convince a judge that the recording is essential and justified to be granted the permission (see Mizrahi case for example).

All the above is as far as I know.

I would be glad to read a response from other readers that are prominent with our laws and regulations (lawyers, Judges) to clarify this issue.

On my return back in a few weeks time I will investigate this point to the root.

If I am wrong then we are in a state of a chaos. It means that we have yet to learn much from the gentiles what true democracy is.

It seems that we have not yet secured fully the privacy and human rights in our country and that is alarming.

Again, if you are correct then I hope that some Israeli lawmakers are reading these postings and taking notes.